Modelo de Robótica Educativa con el Robot Darwin Mini para Desarrollar Competencias en Estudiantes de Licenciatura

José Luis Sánchez Ramírez; Cristina Juárez Landín

doi:10.23913/ride.v8i15.325

José Luis Sánchez Ramírez Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México
Cristina Juárez Landín Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México

DOI: https://doi.org/10.23913/ride.v8i15.325

Resumen

En este trabajo se plantea la utilización de un robot didáctico para fomentar el desarrollo de competencias, que es una vertiente novedosa que se genera en el ámbito académico y de investigación para el fortalecimiento del conocimiento multidisciplinario en estudiantes de nivel Licenciatura. Para esto se planteó y diseñó un conjunto de estrategias que se implementarán con los estudiantes mediante la herramienta tecnológica más adecuada que se tenga disponible, realizando previamente un amplio análisis de los diferentes Robots con fines didácticos que hay en el mercado para poder elegir la opción que mejor se adapte a nuestras necesidades, por lo cual se seleccionó el Robot Darwin Mini de la marca Robotis, que es un robot de forma humanoide que contiene una amplia gama de utilidades y funcionalidades que les permiten a los estudiantes motivar y potenciar el aprendizaje en diferentes ámbitos de la educación, desde la construcción del robot que requiere la intervención de varias disciplinas como mecánica, informática, electrónica, matemáticas, física, etc., hasta su programación y utilización, que implica a su vez otro conjunto de conocimientos. Dichas estrategias permiten identificar las pautas a seguir que se consideran en un modelo de robótica educativa.

Descargas

La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.

Citas

Almeida, L.B., Azevedo, J., Cardeira, C., Costa, P. (2000). Mobile robot competitions: fostering advances in research, development and education in robotics. Proc. CONTROLO, Conf. on Automatic Control, University of Minho, Portugal, 1(1), 592–597.

Balch, T., Summet, J., Blank, D., Kumar, D., Gyzdial, M., O’Hara, K., Walker, D., Sweat, M., Gupta, G., Tansley, S., Jackson, J., Gupta, M., Muhammand, M.N, Prashad, S., Eilbert, N., Gavin, H. (2008). Designing personal robots for education: hardware, software, and curriculum. IEEE, Pervasive Computing, 7(2), 5–9.

Chang, C.W., Lee, J.H., Chao, P.Y., Wang, C.Y. (2010). Exploring the possibility of using humanoid robots as instructional tools for teaching a second language in primary school. Educational Technology and Society, 13(2), 13–24.

Chiou, A. (2004). Teaching technology using educational robotics. UniServe Science Scholarly Inquiry Symposium Proceedings, Queensland University, 1(1), 9–14.

Church, W., Ford, T., Perova, N., Rogers, C. (Marzo, 2010). Physics with robotics: using lego mindstorms in high school education. Conference in Educational Robotics and Beyond, Proc. Advancement of Artificial Intelligence Spring Symposium, Stanford, California, USA.

Goodrich, M. A., Schultz, A. C. (2007). Human robot interaction: a survey. Foundations and Trends in Human–Computer Interaction, 1(3), 203–275.

Han, J., Jo, M., Jones, V., Jo, J.H. (2008). Comparative study on the educational use of home robots for children. Revista de Sistemas de Procesamiento de Información. 4(4), 159–168.

Han, J., Kim, D., (Marzo, 2009). R-Learning services for elementary school students with a teaching assistant robot. Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference, La Jolla, CA, USA.

Han, J.H., Kim, D.H., Kim, J.W. (2009). Physical learning activities with a teaching assistant robot in elementary school music class. Journal of Convergence Information Technology, 5(5), 1406–1410.

Highfield, K., Mulligan, J., & Hedberg, J. (2008). Early mathematics learning through exploration with programmable toys. In O. Figueras, J. L. Cortina, S. Alatorre, T. Rojano, & A. Sepulveda (Eds.), Proceedings Of The Joint Meeting Of Pme 32 And Pme-Na XXX, Vol. 3 (pp. 169-176). (PME Conference Proceedings). Mexico: Cinvestav-UMSNH.

Hirst, A.J., Johnson, J., Petre, M., Price, B.A. (2003). What is the best programming environment/language for teaching robotics using lego mindstorms?. Artificial Life and Robotics, 7(3), 124–131.

Johnson, W.L., Rickel, J.W., Lester, J.C. (2000) Animated pedagogical agents: face-to-face interaction in interactive learning environments. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 11(1), 47–78.

Kanda, T., Hirano, T., Eaton, D., Ishiguro, H. (2004). Interactive robots as social partners and peer tutors for children: a field trial. Human–Computer Interaction, 19(1), 61–84.

Mitnik, R., Nussbaum, M., Soto, A. (2008). An autonomous educational mobile robot mediator. Autonomous Robots, 25(4), 367–382.

Moreno, R., Mayer, R.E., Spires, H.A., Lester, J.C. (2001). The case for social agency in computer-based teaching: do students learn more deeply when they interact with animated pedagogical agents?. Journal Cognition and Instruction, 19(2), 177–213.

Mubin, O., Bartneck, C., Feijs, L., Hooft van Huysduynen, H., Hu, J., Muelver, J. (2012). Improving speech recognition with the robot interaction language. Disruptive Science and Technology, 1(2), 79–88.

Okita, S.Y., Ng-Thow-Hing, V., Sarvadevabhatla, R. (Septiembre, 2009). Learning together: ASIMO developing an interactive learning partnership with children. Proc. ROMAN, The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, Toyama, Japan.

Powers, K., Gross, P., Cooper, S., McNally, M. (2006). Tools for teaching introductory programming: what works?. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 38(1), 560–561.

Ringwood, J.V., Monaghan, K., Maloco, J. (2005). Teaching engineering design through lego mindstorms. European Journal of Engineering Education, 30(1), 91–104.

Ruvolo, P., Fasel, I., Movellan, J. (Mayo, 2008). Auditory mood detection for social and educational robots. En M. Mataric (General Chair), IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Pasadena, CA, USA.

Ryu, H.J., Kwak, S.S., Kim, M.S. (Agosto, 2007). A study on external form design factors for robots as elementary school teaching assistants. The 16th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), Jeju, South Korea.

Saerbeck, M., Schut, T., Bartneck, C., Janse, M.D. (2010). Expressive robots in education: varying the degree of social supportive behavior of a robotic tutor. Proceedings of the 28th ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI2010), Atlanta.

Shin, N., Lee, S. (2008). The effects of appearance and interface design on user perceptions of educational robots. In Proc. 5th International Conference on Ubiquitous Robots and Ambient Intelligence (URAI), Conf. 14372.

Stoeckelmayr, K., Tesar, M., Hofmann, A. (Enero, 2011). Kindergarten children programming robots: a first attempt. Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Robotics in Education (RIE).

Tanaka, F., Matsuzoe, S. (2012). Children teach a care-receiving robot to promote their learning: field experiments in a classroom for vocabulary learning. Journal of HRI, 1(1), 78-95.